The winners of the best architects 16 Award announced
This year’s “best architects 16” award saw the stiffest competition in the award’s 10-year history. With the level of quality represented by the 354 submissions higher than ever, it has never been so hard to earn this distinction. This can be attributed for one thing to the opening up of the award to all of Europe, although the exceptionally high standard of works from the German-speaking world certainly also contributed to the unprecedented concentration of quality architecture.
The jury, comprising Prof. Pia Durisch (Durisch + Nolli Architetti, Massagno), Prof. Muck Petzet (Muck Petzet Architekten, Munich) and Christian Waldner (AllesWirdGut Architektur, Vienna), conferred the “best architects 16” label on a total of 80 projects. An additional nine works were recognised for their outstanding quality with the award “best architects 16 in gold”.
Two French ﬁrms made it into the ranks of gold winners with their very ﬁrst participation in the competition: Éric Lapierre Architecture with the project “85 dwellings in Lyon” and the Bruther architecture ofﬁce with the project “Cultural and Sports Center Saint Blaise area”.
Noteworthy is also the Swiss ﬁrm Graber Pulver Architekten, which was honoured with two gold awards. One went to the project “Energiezentrale Forsthaus, Bern” and one to the “Musée d’ethnographie de Genève”.
A gold award was also bestowed on one of the smallest projects – “Tom’s Hütte” by the ﬁrm Raumhochrosen from Bregenz.
The four remaining gold awards were presented to Roman Hutter Architektur for the project “Heidenhaus in Münster”, to the ﬁrm Schenker Salvi Weber Architekten for their “Wohnbebaung Sillblock Innsbruck”, to Giuliani Hönger Architekten for the project “Bürogebäude Wüst und Wüst, Küsnacht” and to the ﬁrm of Andreas Fuhrimann and Gabrielle Hächler for their project “Zielturm Rotsee”.
These year’s winners impressively demonstrate just how diverse architecture on a very high level can be. At the same time, opening up the award to Europe reveals the disparate approaches taken in the respective regions.
In order to do justice to the complexity and variety of the submitted projects, the jury decided to establish some new categories. “This allowed the jury to make more allowance for the differing issues involved in the speciﬁc construction tasks,” explains Tobias Schwarzer, initiator of the best architects Award. The new categories are Infrastructure and Educational Buildings.